Archive for the ‘SB 10-191’ Category

SB191 Moves to the House.


28 Apr

Dear Representative Middleton:

I have watched SB 191 unfold for some time, and must speak out against this bill. While well-meaning legislative efforts to serve our children’s education are to be encouraged, this piece of legislation is ill-advised.

Each of our children is unique. Each one has different talents and different needs. We serve them well when we dignify their autonomy, their needs, and their talents. We also serve them well when we dignify their teachers’ autonomy in the classroom.

Speak to any young person about educational success, and each will tell you that some teacher made a lasting impression that was inspiring. The relationship that teachers and students develop is a critical component in any true learning. Perhaps it is the most critical component.

However, I hesitate to label it as such, because components such as poverty, and its attendant issues are often overwhelming. Joblessness, poor nutrition, poor role modeling, minimal access to public libraries, lead in the water in poor neighborhoods all are heavy burdens and barriers to developing those meaningful relationships with professional classroom teachers.

Thus, any legislation which attempts to tie teacher evaluations to test scores is an immeasurable insult to our children, their teachers, and indeed all of society. Such legislation has as its point of departure a lack of faith in the profession and a certain skewed mentality that using very flawed measures will somehow improve our children’s education.

Let us investigate who will profit from such a destructive plan. Surely, they will not be the children. Unintended consequences are legion and negative, and will result in a more marginalized and more robotized next generation.

Sincerely,

Don Perl
The Coalition for Better Education, Inc.
www.thecbe.org

Department of Hispanic Studies
University of Northern Colorado
Greeley, Colorado 80639
don.perl@unco.edu

SB 191 ties test scores to teacher pay


16 Apr

Here in Colorado, Senator Johnston’s Senate Bill 191, The Principal and Teacher Evaluation Bill, will be heard in the Senate Ed Committee this Wednesday, April 21st.  This bill will codify Governor Ritter’s executive order.

Read the bill here:

Senate Bill 10-191

Notice the link between educator evaluations and opportunities for non-educators to teach in our children’s classrooms. This is a bill to lower professional educator standards and weaken the requirements and expectations of new teachers. Read the job posting below for the policy director of the New Teacher Project and please help me to find the answers to the following questions:

Questions I’d like the answers to:

We’re seeing tremendous pressure from outside initiatives who are seeking to usurp teacher education and licensing requirements. They claim to address the issue of “teacher capitol” in high poverty areas. I am interested in interviewing candidates from Teach for America and The New Teacher Project (see below job for job posting).

Here’s what I’m looking for:

Program requirements: course curriculums, inservice requirements, and costs associated with the program.

Whose funding these projects?

What are their indicators of program success and what are the outcomes?

Can anyone point me to the research on retention rates for candidates. I vaguely remember an article that mentioned only 30% of Teach for America candidates remain in the education profession. Is this accurate? What may the other indicators of effectiveness be for candidates in these programs?

Are test scores the only indicators? Is there a connection between test publisher and “new” teacher training programs?

Read the job posting for Policy Analyst from the New Teacher Project?

Who benefits from these programs and what are the cost savings?

(more…)

Angela's Blog

angelaengel.com